The UK competition regulator is preparing to launch a formal investigation into the veterinary market after identifying “multiple concerns” in an initial review, including that pet owners may be overpaying for treatments and medicines.
The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) said it wanted to move forward with a full review after an initial inquiry triggered an “unprecedented response” from 56,000 people, including customers and vet professionals, who raised a number of concerns about practices within the £2bn industry.
The watchdog is concerned that consumers may not be given enough information to make informed decisions over care, and that a rise in consolidation resulting in fewer independent surgeries has weakened competition.
US inflation unexpectedly rises to 3.2% in February; UK unemployment climbs – as it happened. Since 2013, about 1,500 of the 5,000 vet practices in the UK have been acquired by six of the largest corporate groups: CVS, IVC, Linnaeus, Medivet, Pets at Home and VetPartners, the CMA said.
Sarah Cardell, the CMA chief executive, said: “Our review has identified multiple concerns with the market that we think should be investigated further. These include pet owners finding it difficult to access basic information like price lists and prescription costs – and potentially overpaying for medicines.
“We are also concerned about weak competition in some areas, driven in part by sector consolidation, and the incentives for large corporate groups to act in ways which may reduce competition and choice.
“Given these strong indications of potential concern, it is time to put our work on a formal footing. We have provisionally decided to launch a market investigation because that’s the quickest route to enable us to take direct action, if needed.”
Independent vet practices accounted for 45% of UK veterinary practices in 2021, down from 89% in 2013. The number of pet owners has also increased, primarily as a result of the pandemic, with about 17m households having a furry companion in the UK.
The regulator is concerned that the larger corporations dominating the sector may be incentivised to act in a way that reduces choice for customers, leaving pet owners overpaying for medicines or prescriptions.
Owing to their scale and ability to invest in advanced equipment, larger companies may concentrate on offering more sophisticated, and therefore higher-cost, treatment that crowds out more affordable options.
Meanwhile, about 25% of pet owners were not aware they had an option to get prescriptions filled more cheaply elsewhere, meaning they were missing out on potential savings, even when accounting for prescription fees. Medicine sales make up about a quarter of the income of some vet practices, leaving little incentive to ensure clients were informed of other options.
The CMA said the situation suggested the regulatory framework may be outdated and no longer be fit for purpose.
Most of the industry’s regulations date to 1966, and primarily cover individual veterinary surgeons rather than non-vet owners, like the corporations that own the majority of sites today.
It means the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons has limited leverage, including over transparency of pricing and and the true ownership structure of chain-owned practices.
Privacy Notice: Newsletters may contain info about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. For more information see our Privacy Policy. We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
“The provisional view is that outcomes for consumers could be improved if regulatory requirements and/or elements of best practice could be monitored or enforced more effectively,” the CMA said.
It will run a four-week consultation, before launching a formal investigation, giving it power to potentially mandate that vets give certain information to consumers, cap prescription fees or order the sale of businesses or assets, which could include breaking up some vet chains.The industry body, the British Veterinary Association (BVA), welcomed prospects for reform, saying that regulation was “not fit for purpose” and was failing vet teams and clients.
“Whether they are employed by corporate or independently owned practices, vets deliver highly specialised, tailored care for the UK’s pets and the cost is a fair reflection of investment in medical equipment, supplies and medicines, and the time vet teams dedicate to the care of each patient,” the BVA president, Anna Judson, said.
“At the British Veterinary Association, we’re keen to see healthy competition and consumer choice and so we are already taking steps to support vet practices to be more transparent both in terms of costs and practice ownership. It’s important that clients have as wide a choice of vet practices as possible so they can find a service that best suits the needs of themselves and their animals,” Judson added.
“We will continue to engage constructively with the CMA by responding to this latest consultation and will continue to play a leadership role in driving positive change for vets and their clients.”
Do you know who hates the Guardian?
The billionaires creating a world that’s more unequal than ever.
The populist politicians spreading discord and misinformation.
The fossil fuel executives watching the planet burn as their profits swell.
The tech giants shaping a new world around us without scrutiny.
And do you know who does like us? People who believe in a free press. People who believe that the truth should be available to everyone. And people who recognise the importance of challenging those in positions of power and influence, including in Vietnam. Does that sound like you?
The Guardian knows that not everyone can pay for a subscription to keep up to date with the important stories shaping our world.
That’s why, even though good journalism can cost a lot of money, we still choose to keep ours open to all.
But we can only do that with the help of those who are able to help to fund our work.
Will you choose to join them today? It only takes a minute. Su
